Brunei Darussalam vs Saudi Arabia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Brunei Darussalam
20.8%
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
20.3%
in 2020
Brunei Darussalam rank
40th
Saudi Arabia rank
42nd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 20.8% against 20.3% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 40th and Saudi Arabia ranks 42nd of 141 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.0% | 16.9% | 1.1% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 20.3% | 18.7% | 1.6% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2020s | 20.8% | 20.3% | 0.4% | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Brunei Darussalam or Saudi Arabia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 20.8% against 20.3% in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Brunei Darussalam and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.5%, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Saudi Arabia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Saudi Arabia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 40th and Saudi Arabia ranks 42nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.