Canada vs Peru: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Canada
16.1%
in 2020
Peru
15.6%
in 2020
Canada rank
110th
Peru rank
113th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Canada
- Peru
How they compare
Canada currently reports 16.1% against 15.6% in Peru, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Peru ahead.
Canada ranks 110th and Peru ranks 113th of 141 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.1% | 11.6% | 0.5% | Peru |
| 2000s | 13.3% | 12.7% | 0.6% | Canada |
| 2010s | 15.1% | 14.4% | 0.6% | Canada |
| 2020s | 16.1% | 15.6% | 0.5% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Canada or Peru?
- Canada, at 16.1% against 15.6% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Canada and Peru?
- 0.5%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Peru?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Canada and Peru rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Canada ranks 110th and Peru ranks 113th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.