Central African Republic vs Latvia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Central African Republic
28.4%
in 2020
Latvia
26.8%
in 2020
Central African Republic rank
7th
Latvia rank
9th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Central African Republic
- Latvia
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 28.4% against 26.8% in Latvia, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 9th of 141 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.0% | 19.2% | 11.8% | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 28.4% | 26.8% | 1.6% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Central African Republic or Latvia?
- Central African Republic, at 28.4% against 26.8% in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Central African Republic and Latvia?
- 1.6%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Central African Republic and Latvia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Central African Republic ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 9th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.