Ecuador vs South Africa: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Ecuador
16.7%
in 2019
South Africa
16.6%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
100th
South Africa rank
102nd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 16.7% against 16.6% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 100th and South Africa ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.9% | 10.8% | 2.1% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 15.5% | 13.1% | 2.4% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 18.1% | 15.5% | 2.6% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Ecuador or South Africa?
- Ecuador, at 16.7% against 16.6% in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Ecuador ranks 100th and South Africa ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.