Egypt vs New Zealand: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Egypt
13.2%
in 2015
New Zealand
13.5%
in 2015
Egypt rank
132nd
New Zealand rank
130th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Egypt
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 13.5% against 13.2% in Egypt, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 132nd and New Zealand ranks 130th of 141 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.9% | 11.5% | 3.4% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 14.7% | 12.9% | 1.7% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Egypt or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 13.5% against 13.2% in Egypt as of 2015.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Egypt and New Zealand?
- 0.3%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and New Zealand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Egypt and New Zealand rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Egypt ranks 132nd and New Zealand ranks 130th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.