El Salvador vs Namibia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
El Salvador
15.4%
in 2020
Namibia
15.2%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
115th
Namibia rank
116th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- El Salvador
- Namibia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 15.4% against 15.2% in Namibia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 116th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 15.0% | 1.7% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 17.2% | 15.0% | 2.2% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 15.4% | 15.2% | 0.2% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, El Salvador or Namibia?
- El Salvador, at 15.4% against 15.2% in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between El Salvador and Namibia?
- 0.2%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do El Salvador and Namibia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- El Salvador ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 116th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.