Equatorial Guinea vs Solomon Islands: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Equatorial Guinea
29.5%
in 2018
Solomon Islands
32.6%
in 2020
Equatorial Guinea rank
5th
Solomon Islands rank
3rd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 32.6% against 29.5% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Solomon Islands ranks 3rd of 141 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Equatorial Guinea or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 32.6% against 29.5% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 3.1%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Solomon Islands ranks 3rd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.