Eswatini vs Singapore: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Eswatini
17.0%
in 2020
Singapore
17.0%
in 2019
Eswatini rank
91st
Singapore rank
92nd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Eswatini
- Singapore
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 17.0% against 17.0% in Singapore, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Singapore ahead.
Eswatini ranks 91st and Singapore ranks 92nd of 141 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.7% | 15.8% | 6.9% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 21.7% | 16.8% | 4.8% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Eswatini or Singapore?
- Eswatini, at 17.0% against 17.0% in Singapore as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Eswatini and Singapore?
- 0.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Singapore rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Eswatini ranks 91st and Singapore ranks 92nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.