Fiji vs Malaysia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Fiji
19.1%
in 2020
Malaysia
18.9%
in 2020
Fiji rank
64th
Malaysia rank
67th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Fiji
- Malaysia
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 19.1% against 18.9% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malaysia ahead.
Fiji ranks 64th and Malaysia ranks 67th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.5% | 18.2% | 0.7% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 16.4% | 16.8% | 0.3% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 19.1% | 18.9% | 0.3% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Fiji or Malaysia?
- Fiji, at 19.1% against 18.9% in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Fiji and Malaysia?
- 0.2%, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Fiji and Malaysia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Fiji ranks 64th and Malaysia ranks 67th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.