Finland vs Ghana: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Finland
20.0%
in 2020
Ghana
19.8%
in 2020
Finland rank
48th
Ghana rank
51st
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Finland
- Ghana
How they compare
Finland currently reports 20.0% against 19.8% in Ghana, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 48th and Ghana ranks 51st of 141 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.7% | 11.3% | 0.4% | Finland |
| 2000s | 14.7% | 14.3% | 0.5% | Finland |
| 2010s | 18.9% | 18.6% | 0.3% | Finland |
| 2020s | 20.0% | 19.8% | 0.1% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Finland or Ghana?
- Finland, at 20.0% against 19.8% in Ghana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Finland and Ghana?
- 0.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Ghana?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Ghana rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Finland ranks 48th and Ghana ranks 51st of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.