Finland vs South Sudan: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Finland
20.0%
in 2020
South Sudan
20.2%
in 2015
Finland rank
48th
South Sudan rank
45th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Finland
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 20.2% against 20.0% in Finland, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 48th and South Sudan ranks 45th of 141 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Finland or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 20.2% against 20.0% in Finland as of 2015.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Finland and South Sudan?
- 0.2%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Finland and South Sudan rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Finland ranks 48th and South Sudan ranks 45th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.