Finland vs Zambia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Finland
20.0%
in 2020
Zambia
20.1%
in 2020
Finland rank
48th
Zambia rank
46th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Finland
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 20.1% against 20.0% in Finland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Finland ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 46th of 141 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.9% | 23.4% | 4.6% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 20.0% | 20.1% | 0.1% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Finland or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 20.1% against 20.0% in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Finland and Zambia?
- 0.1%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zambia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Zambia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Finland ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 46th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.