Ghana vs Poland: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Ghana
19.8%
in 2020
Poland
19.8%
in 2020
Ghana rank
51st
Poland rank
52nd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Ghana
- Poland
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 19.8% against 19.8% in Poland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Poland ahead.
Ghana ranks 51st and Poland ranks 52nd of 141 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.3% | 12.4% | 1.1% | Poland |
| 2000s | 14.3% | 13.4% | 0.9% | Ghana |
| 2010s | 18.6% | 16.0% | 2.5% | Ghana |
| 2020s | 19.8% | 19.8% | 0.0% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Ghana or Poland?
- Ghana, at 19.8% against 19.8% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Ghana and Poland?
- 0.0%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Poland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Ghana and Poland rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Ghana ranks 51st and Poland ranks 52nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.