Hong Kong vs Malawi: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%)
Hong Kong
20.7%
in 2020
Malawi
21.3%
in 2020
Hong Kong rank
41st
Malawi rank
38th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%) over time
- Hong Kong
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 21.3% against 20.7% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 41st and Malawi ranks 38th of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.5% | 18.4% | 1.2% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 20.7% | 21.3% | 0.6% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Hong Kong or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 21.3% against 20.7% in Hong Kong as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Hong Kong and Malawi?
- 0.6%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Hong Kong and Malawi rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Hong Kong ranks 41st and Malawi ranks 38th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.