Hong Kong vs Serbia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Hong Kong
20.7%
in 2020
Serbia
20.9%
in 2015
Hong Kong rank
41st
Serbia rank
39th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Hong Kong
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 20.9% against 20.7% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 41st and Serbia ranks 39th of 141 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 25.8% | 10.7% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 16.4% | 20.1% | 3.7% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Hong Kong or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 20.9% against 20.7% in Hong Kong as of 2015.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Hong Kong and Serbia?
- 0.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Hong Kong and Serbia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Hong Kong ranks 41st and Serbia ranks 39th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.