Israel vs Macau, China: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Israel
14.4%
in 2020
Macau, China
14.5%
in 2020
Israel rank
126th
Macau, China rank
124th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Israel
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 14.5% against 14.4% in Israel, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Macau, China ahead.
Israel ranks 126th and Macau, China ranks 124th of 141 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.4% | 14.8% | 0.4% | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 14.4% | 14.5% | 0.1% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Israel or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 14.5% against 14.4% in Israel as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Israel and Macau, China?
- 0.1%, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Macau, China?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Israel and Macau, China rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Israel ranks 126th and Macau, China ranks 124th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.