Japan vs Singapore: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Japan
16.9%
in 2020
Singapore
17.0%
in 2019
Japan rank
94th
Singapore rank
92nd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Japan
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 17.0% against 16.9% in Japan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Singapore ahead.
Japan ranks 94th and Singapore ranks 92nd of 141 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.8% | 19.4% | 8.6% | Singapore |
| 2000s | 11.5% | 16.6% | 5.0% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 15.7% | 16.8% | 1.2% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Japan or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 17.0% against 16.9% in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Japan and Singapore?
- 0.1%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Singapore?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Singapore rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Japan ranks 94th and Singapore ranks 92nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.