Malawi vs Malta: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Malawi
21.3%
in 2020
Malta
21.7%
in 2020
Malawi rank
38th
Malta rank
35th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Malawi
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 21.7% against 21.3% in Malawi, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 38th and Malta ranks 35th of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.4% | 17.3% | 1.0% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 21.3% | 21.7% | 0.4% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Malawi or Malta?
- Malta, at 21.7% against 21.3% in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Malawi and Malta?
- 0.4%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Malta rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Malawi ranks 38th and Malta ranks 35th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.