Namibia vs Peru: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Namibia
15.2%
in 2020
Peru
15.6%
in 2020
Namibia rank
116th
Peru rank
113th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Namibia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 15.6% against 15.2% in Namibia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 116th and Peru ranks 113th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.0% | 12.6% | 2.4% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 15.0% | 14.4% | 0.5% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 15.2% | 15.6% | 0.4% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Namibia or Peru?
- Peru, at 15.6% against 15.2% in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Namibia and Peru?
- 0.4%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Peru?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Namibia and Peru rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Namibia ranks 116th and Peru ranks 113th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.