North Macedonia vs South Africa: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
North Macedonia
16.7%
in 2020
South Africa
16.6%
in 2020
North Macedonia rank
99th
South Africa rank
102nd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- North Macedonia
- South Africa
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 16.7% against 16.6% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 99th and South Africa ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27.3% | 10.8% | 16.5% | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 20.8% | 12.9% | 7.8% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 16.2% | 15.5% | 0.7% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 16.7% | 16.6% | 0.1% | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, North Macedonia or South Africa?
- North Macedonia, at 16.7% against 16.6% in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between North Macedonia and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and South Africa?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do North Macedonia and South Africa rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- North Macedonia ranks 99th and South Africa ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.