Philippines vs South Africa: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Philippines
16.3%
in 2020
South Africa
16.6%
in 2020
Philippines rank
104th
South Africa rank
102nd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Philippines
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 16.6% against 16.3% in Philippines, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 104th and South Africa ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.6% | 10.8% | 6.8% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 16.6% | 12.9% | 3.6% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 15.5% | 0.4% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 16.6% | 0.2% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Philippines or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 16.6% against 16.3% in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Philippines and South Africa?
- 0.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and South Africa rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Philippines ranks 104th and South Africa ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.