Philippines vs Sri Lanka: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Philippines
16.3%
in 2020
Sri Lanka
16.5%
in 2020
Philippines rank
104th
Sri Lanka rank
103rd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Philippines
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 16.5% against 16.3% in Philippines, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 104th and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.8% | 15.4% | 0.4% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 16.5% | 0.2% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Philippines or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 16.5% against 16.3% in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Philippines and Sri Lanka?
- 0.2%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Sri Lanka rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Philippines ranks 104th and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.