Philippines vs United States: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%)
Philippines
16.3%
in 2020
United States
16.3%
in 2020
Philippines rank
104th
United States rank
105th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%) over time
- Philippines
- United States
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 16.3% against 16.3% in United States, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 104th and United States ranks 105th of 141 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.6% | 12.2% | 5.4% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 16.6% | 13.0% | 3.6% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 14.5% | 1.4% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 16.3% | 0.1% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Philippines or United States?
- Philippines, at 16.3% against 16.3% in United States as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Philippines and United States?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and United States?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and United States rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Philippines ranks 104th and United States ranks 105th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.