Russian Federation vs Viet Nam: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Russian Federation
12.5%
in 2020
Viet Nam
11.8%
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
134th
Viet Nam rank
137th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Russian Federation
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 12.5% against 11.8% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 134th and Viet Nam ranks 137th of 141 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.9% | 12.9% | 5.9% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 13.5% | 12.3% | 1.2% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Russian Federation or Viet Nam?
- Russian Federation, at 12.5% against 11.8% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Russian Federation and Viet Nam?
- 0.7%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Viet Nam?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Viet Nam rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Russian Federation ranks 134th and Viet Nam ranks 137th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.