Singapore vs Trinidad and Tobago: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Singapore
17.0%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
17.1%
in 2020
Singapore rank
92nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
89th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Singapore
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 17.1% against 17.0% in Singapore, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 92nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 89th of 141 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Singapore or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 17.1% against 17.0% in Singapore as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Singapore and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.1%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Singapore and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Singapore ranks 92nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 89th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.