South Sudan vs Zambia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
South Sudan
20.2%
in 2015
Zambia
20.1%
in 2020
South Sudan rank
45th
Zambia rank
46th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- South Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 20.2% against 20.1% in Zambia, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 45th and Zambia ranks 46th of 141 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, South Sudan or Zambia?
- South Sudan, at 20.2% against 20.1% in Zambia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between South Sudan and Zambia?
- 0.1%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do South Sudan and Zambia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- South Sudan ranks 45th and Zambia ranks 46th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.