Turkmenistan vs United Arab Emirates: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Turkmenistan
18.0%
in 2014
United Arab Emirates
18.1%
in 2020
Turkmenistan rank
79th
United Arab Emirates rank
76th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Turkmenistan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 18.1% against 18.0% in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Turkmenistan ranks 79th and United Arab Emirates ranks 76th of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Turkmenistan averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turkmenistan | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.5% | 19.9% | 3.4% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 23.8% | 19.5% | 4.4% | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Turkmenistan or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 18.1% against 18.0% in Turkmenistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Turkmenistan and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.1%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Turkmenistan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Turkmenistan ranks 79th and United Arab Emirates ranks 76th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.