Latvia vs Macau, China: Bank return on assets
Latvia
0.7%
in 2021
Macau, China
0.7%
in 2021
Latvia rank
123rd
Macau, China rank
125th
Bank return on assets over time
- Latvia
- Macau, China
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.7% against 0.7% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 123rd and Macau, China ranks 125th of 168 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.1% | 1.2% | 0.1% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.6% | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.3% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank return on assets, Latvia or Macau, China?
- Latvia, at 0.7% against 0.7% in Macau, China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank return on assets between Latvia and Macau, China?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Macau, China?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Macau, China rank globally for bank return on assets?
- Latvia ranks 123rd and Macau, China ranks 125th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank return on assets (%, after tax). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2115[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.