Hong Kong, China vs Lebanon: Bank Z-score
Bank Z-score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 20.19 against 19.75 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 51st and Lebanon ranks 49th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.02 | 16.31 | 3.71 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 18.49 | 19.41 | 0.9123 | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 19.91 | 18.96 | 0.9458 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank z-score, Hong Kong, China or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 20.19 against 19.75 in Hong Kong, China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank z-score between Hong Kong, China and Lebanon?
- 0.44, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lebanon?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Lebanon rank globally for bank z-score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 51st and Lebanon ranks 49th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank Z-score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It captures the probability of default of a country's banking system. Z-score compares the buffer of a country's banking system (capitalization and returns) with the volatility of those returns. It is estimated as (ROA+(equity/assets))/sd(ROA); sd(ROA) is the standard deviation of ROA. ROA, equity, and assets are country-level aggregate figures Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.