Hong Kong vs Oman: Bank Z-score
Bank Z-score over time
- Hong Kong
- Oman
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 19.75 against 19.64 in Oman, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 51st and Oman ranks 52nd of 170 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.02 | 17.72 | 2.31 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 18.49 | 17.26 | 1.23 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 19.91 | 19.53 | 0.3742 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank z-score, Hong Kong or Oman?
- Hong Kong, at 19.75 against 19.64 in Oman as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank z-score between Hong Kong and Oman?
- 0.11, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Oman?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong and Oman rank globally for bank z-score?
- Hong Kong ranks 51st and Oman ranks 52nd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank Z-score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It captures the probability of default of a country's banking system. Z-score compares the buffer of a country's banking system (capitalization and returns) with the volatility of those returns. It is estimated as (ROA+(equity/assets))/sd(ROA); sd(ROA) is the standard deviation of ROA. ROA, equity, and assets are country-level aggregate figures Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.