Malaysia vs Rwanda: Bank Z-score
Bank Z-score over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 21.42 against 20.72 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 45th and Rwanda ranks 43rd of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.76 | 12.97 | 1.79 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 18.98 | 20.53 | 1.56 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 20.56 | 21.59 | 1.03 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank z-score, Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 21.42 against 20.72 in Malaysia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank z-score between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 0.7, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for bank z-score?
- Malaysia ranks 45th and Rwanda ranks 43rd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank Z-score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It captures the probability of default of a country's banking system. Z-score compares the buffer of a country's banking system (capitalization and returns) with the volatility of those returns. It is estimated as (ROA+(equity/assets))/sd(ROA); sd(ROA) is the standard deviation of ROA. ROA, equity, and assets are country-level aggregate figures Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.