Malaysia vs Tanzania: Bank Z-score
Bank Z-score over time
- Malaysia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 22.18 against 20.72 in Malaysia, a difference of 1.46.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 45th and Tanzania ranks 42nd of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.8 | 15.38 | 0.5862 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 18.98 | 18.14 | 0.8365 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 20.56 | 21.38 | 0.8252 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank z-score, Malaysia or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 22.18 against 20.72 in Malaysia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank z-score between Malaysia and Tanzania?
- 1.46, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tanzania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Tanzania rank globally for bank z-score?
- Malaysia ranks 45th and Tanzania ranks 42nd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank Z-score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It captures the probability of default of a country's banking system. Z-score compares the buffer of a country's banking system (capitalization and returns) with the volatility of those returns. It is estimated as (ROA+(equity/assets))/sd(ROA); sd(ROA) is the standard deviation of ROA. ROA, equity, and assets are country-level aggregate figures Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.