Malaysia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Bank Z-score
Bank Z-score over time
- Malaysia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 21.36 against 20.72 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.64.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Malaysia ranks 45th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 44th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.95 | 16 | 1.06 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 18.7 | 20.49 | 1.8 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 20.56 | 20.01 | 0.5516 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank z-score, Malaysia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 21.36 against 20.72 in Malaysia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank z-score between Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.64, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for bank z-score?
- Malaysia ranks 45th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 44th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank Z-score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It captures the probability of default of a country's banking system. Z-score compares the buffer of a country's banking system (capitalization and returns) with the volatility of those returns. It is estimated as (ROA+(equity/assets))/sd(ROA); sd(ROA) is the standard deviation of ROA. ROA, equity, and assets are country-level aggregate figures Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.