Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Banking crisis dummy

Equatorial Guinea
0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
in 2017
Namibia
0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
in 2017
Equatorial Guinea rank
4th
Namibia rank
4th

Banking crisis dummy over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.81197019932017

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none against 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none in Namibia, a difference of 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Namibia ranks 4th of 212 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
1980s 0.1 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0.1 1=banking crisis, 0=none Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
2000s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
2010s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher banking crisis dummy, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none against 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none in Namibia as of 2017.
What is the difference in banking crisis dummy between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
0 1=banking crisis, 0=none, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2017.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for banking crisis dummy?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Namibia ranks 4th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Luc Laeven and Fabián Valencia, 2012. “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update”, IMF Working Paper WP/12/163, published as Banking crisis dummy (1=banking crisis, 0=none). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Banking crisis dummy. Statizoid, drawing on Luc Laeven and Fabián Valencia, 2012. “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update”, IMF Working Paper WP/12/163. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/banking-crisis-dummy-1-banking-crisis-0-none/equatorial-guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/banking-crisis-dummy-1-banking-crisis-0-none/equatorial-guinea/namibia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Banking crisis dummy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Banking crisis dummy (1=banking crisis, 0=none)
Unit
1=banking crisis, 0=none
Source
Luc Laeven and Fabián Valencia, 2012. “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update”, IMF Working Paper WP/12/163
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
212 places, 10,162 data points, 1970–2017
Last refreshed

A banking crisis is defined as systemic if two conditions are met: a. Significant signs of financial distress in the banking system (as indicated bysignificant bank runs, losses in the banking system, and/or bank liquidations), b. Significant banking policy intervention measures in response to significant losses in the banking system. The first year that both criteria are met is considered as the year when the crisis start becoming systemic. The end of a crisis is defined the year before both real GDP growth and real credit growth are positive for at least two consecutive years.