Namibia vs Netherlands: Banking crisis dummy

Namibia
0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
in 2017
Netherlands
0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
in 2017
Namibia rank
4th
Netherlands rank
4th

Banking crisis dummy over time

  • Namibia
  • Netherlands
00.20.40.60.81197019932017

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none against 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none in Netherlands, a difference of 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 4th of 212 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
1980s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
1990s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none
2000s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0.2 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0.2 1=banking crisis, 0=none Netherlands
2010s 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher banking crisis dummy, Namibia or Netherlands?
Namibia, at 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none against 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none in Netherlands as of 2017.
What is the difference in banking crisis dummy between Namibia and Netherlands?
0 1=banking crisis, 0=none, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Netherlands?
48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2017.
How do Namibia and Netherlands rank globally for banking crisis dummy?
Namibia ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 4th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Luc Laeven and Fabián Valencia, 2012. “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update”, IMF Working Paper WP/12/163, published as Banking crisis dummy (1=banking crisis, 0=none). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Netherlands: Banking crisis dummy. Statizoid, drawing on Luc Laeven and Fabián Valencia, 2012. “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update”, IMF Working Paper WP/12/163. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/banking-crisis-dummy-1-banking-crisis-0-none/namibia/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/banking-crisis-dummy-1-banking-crisis-0-none/namibia/netherlands/">Namibia vs Netherlands: Banking crisis dummy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Banking crisis dummy (1=banking crisis, 0=none)
Unit
1=banking crisis, 0=none
Source
Luc Laeven and Fabián Valencia, 2012. “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update”, IMF Working Paper WP/12/163
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
212 places, 10,162 data points, 1970–2017
Last refreshed

A banking crisis is defined as systemic if two conditions are met: a. Significant signs of financial distress in the banking system (as indicated bysignificant bank runs, losses in the banking system, and/or bank liquidations), b. Significant banking policy intervention measures in response to significant losses in the banking system. The first year that both criteria are met is considered as the year when the crisis start becoming systemic. The end of a crisis is defined the year before both real GDP growth and real credit growth are positive for at least two consecutive years.