Namibia vs Uganda: Banking crisis dummy
Banking crisis dummy over time
- Namibia
- Uganda
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none against 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none in Uganda, a difference of 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none.
Across all 48 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 4th and Uganda ranks 4th of 212 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | — |
| 1980s | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | — |
| 1990s | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0.1 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0.1 1=banking crisis, 0=none | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | — |
| 2010s | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher banking crisis dummy, Namibia or Uganda?
- Namibia, at 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none against 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none in Uganda as of 2017.
- What is the difference in banking crisis dummy between Namibia and Uganda?
- 0 1=banking crisis, 0=none, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uganda?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2017.
- How do Namibia and Uganda rank globally for banking crisis dummy?
- Namibia ranks 4th and Uganda ranks 4th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Luc Laeven and Fabián Valencia, 2012. “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update”, IMF Working Paper WP/12/163, published as Banking crisis dummy (1=banking crisis, 0=none). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A banking crisis is defined as systemic if two conditions are met: a. Significant signs of financial distress in the banking system (as indicated bysignificant bank runs, losses in the banking system, and/or bank liquidations), b. Significant banking policy intervention measures in response to significant losses in the banking system. The first year that both criteria are met is considered as the year when the crisis start becoming systemic. The end of a crisis is defined the year before both real GDP growth and real credit growth are positive for at least two consecutive years.