Guatemala vs South Africa: Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre

Guatemala
4.31 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
4.20 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
101st
South Africa rank
102nd

Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • South Africa
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 4.31 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.20 million current LCU per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 113,420 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was South Africa ahead.

Guatemala ranks 101st and South Africa ranks 102nd of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 2,420 current LCU per square kilometre 4,769 current LCU per square kilometre 2,350 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 8,128 current LCU per square kilometre 13,068 current LCU per square kilometre 4,940 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 30,999 current LCU per square kilometre 59,533 current LCU per square kilometre 28,535 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 159,455 current LCU per square kilometre 231,113 current LCU per square kilometre 71,658 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 821,784 current LCU per square kilometre 947,602 current LCU per square kilometre 125,817 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 2.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 239,690 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 3.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.77 million current LCU per square kilometre 150,808 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher broad money (current lcu), per square kilometre, Guatemala or South Africa?
Guatemala, at 4.31 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.20 million current LCU per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in broad money (current lcu), per square kilometre between Guatemala and South Africa?
113,420 current LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Africa?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and South Africa rank globally for broad money (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 101st and South Africa ranks 102nd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs South Africa: Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/broad-money-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/broad-money-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/south-africa/">Guatemala vs South Africa: Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Broad money (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.