Madagascar vs Malawi: Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre

Madagascar
32.77 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
39.02 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
52nd
Malawi rank
50th

Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196219922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 39.02 million current LCU per square kilometre against 32.77 million current LCU per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 6.25 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 52nd and Malawi ranks 50th of 165 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 13,731 current LCU per square kilometre 347.87 current LCU per square kilometre 13,383 current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 30,565 current LCU per square kilometre 1,183 current LCU per square kilometre 29,382 current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 117,417 current LCU per square kilometre 4,886 current LCU per square kilometre 112,531 current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 844,842 current LCU per square kilometre 49,521 current LCU per square kilometre 795,321 current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 3.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 708,706 current LCU per square kilometre 3.25 million current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 13.53 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.82 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.71 million current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 28.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 26.53 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.88 million current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher broad money (current lcu), per square kilometre, Madagascar or Malawi?
Malawi, at 39.02 million current LCU per square kilometre against 32.77 million current LCU per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in broad money (current lcu), per square kilometre between Madagascar and Malawi?
6.25 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Malawi?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Malawi rank globally for broad money (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Madagascar ranks 52nd and Malawi ranks 50th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Malawi: Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/broad-money-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/broad-money-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/malawi/">Madagascar vs Malawi: Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Broad money (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Broad money (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.