China (People’s Republic of) vs Namibia: Broad money growth
Broad money growth over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Namibia
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 6.8% against 6.8% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 113th and Namibia ranks 114th of 166 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China (People’s Republic of) averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.7% | 23.6% | 3.2% | China (People’s Republic of) |
| 2000s | 17.6% | 18.3% | 0.7% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 12.4% | 9.3% | 3.1% | China (People’s Republic of) |
| 2020s | 9.5% | 7.4% | 2.1% | China (People’s Republic of) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, China (People’s Republic of) or Namibia?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 6.8% against 6.8% in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between China (People’s Republic of) and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Namibia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Namibia rank globally for broad money growth?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 113th and Namibia ranks 114th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.