Costa Rica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Broad money growth
Broad money growth over time
- Costa Rica
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 5.6% against 5.3% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 124th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 126th of 167 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 29.4% | 15.1% | 14.3% | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 18.0% | 10.3% | 7.6% | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 34.8% | 9.8% | 25.0% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 5.5% | 3.4% | 2.1% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 7.7% | 1.7% | 5.9% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Costa Rica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Costa Rica, at 5.6% against 5.3% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.3%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for broad money growth?
- Costa Rica ranks 124th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 126th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.