Dominican Republic vs Nigeria: Broad money growth (annual %)
Broad money growth (annual %) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Nigeria
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 12.0% against 11.9% in Nigeria, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 29 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 66th and Nigeria ranks 68th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.0% | 10.7% | 2.7% | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 20.6% | 33.3% | 12.7% | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 24.9% | 16.6% | 8.2% | Dominican Republic |
| 1990s | 22.9% | 32.9% | 10.0% | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 21.2% | 33.1% | 11.9% | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 10.6% | 12.8% | 2.2% | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 13.1% | 25.0% | 11.9% | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Dominican Republic or Nigeria?
- Dominican Republic, at 12.0% against 11.9% in Nigeria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Dominican Republic and Nigeria?
- 0.1%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Nigeria?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Nigeria rank globally for broad money growth?
- Dominican Republic ranks 66th and Nigeria ranks 68th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.