Guyana vs Solomon Islands: Broad money growth (annual %)
Broad money growth (annual %) over time
- Guyana
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 28.4% against 24.8% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Guyana ranks 15th and Solomon Islands ranks 17th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8.4% | 44.9% | 36.5% | Solomon Islands |
| 1980s | 27.0% | 13.8% | 13.2% | Guyana |
| 1990s | 29.6% | 14.0% | 15.6% | Guyana |
| 2000s | 11.3% | 15.7% | 4.5% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 8.0% | 11.0% | 3.0% | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 19.5% | 8.1% | 11.4% | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Guyana or Solomon Islands?
- Guyana, at 28.4% against 24.8% in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Guyana and Solomon Islands?
- 3.6%, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Solomon Islands?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2025.
- How do Guyana and Solomon Islands rank globally for broad money growth?
- Guyana ranks 15th and Solomon Islands ranks 17th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.