Kuwait vs Solomon Islands: Broad money growth
Broad money growth over time
- Kuwait
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 3.8% against 3.6% in Kuwait, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Kuwait ranks 139th and Solomon Islands ranks 136th of 166 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 16.0% | 44.9% | 28.9% | Solomon Islands |
| 1980s | 10.7% | 13.8% | 3.1% | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 3.1% | 13.2% | 10.1% | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 12.6% | 15.7% | 3.1% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 4.3% | 11.0% | 6.7% | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 4.8% | 3.1% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Kuwait or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 3.8% against 3.6% in Kuwait as of 2024.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Kuwait and Solomon Islands?
- 0.2%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Solomon Islands?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
- How do Kuwait and Solomon Islands rank globally for broad money growth?
- Kuwait ranks 139th and Solomon Islands ranks 136th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.