Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Malawi: Broad money growth
Broad money growth over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 45.1% against 39.1% in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 6.0%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 8th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lao People's Democratic Republic averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.0% | 32.3% | 14.7% | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 2000s | 26.3% | 30.6% | 4.2% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 39.1% | 33.1% | 6.0% | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 45.1% against 39.1% in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Malawi?
- 6.0%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Malawi?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Malawi rank globally for broad money growth?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 8th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.