Malaysia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Broad money growth
Broad money growth over time
- Malaysia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 5.3% against 4.6% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 129th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 126th of 167 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 15.0% | 15.1% | 0.1% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1990s | 14.8% | 10.3% | 4.5% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 9.6% | 9.8% | 0.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 6.5% | 3.4% | 3.1% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 4.6% | 1.7% | 2.9% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Malaysia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 5.3% against 4.6% in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Malaysia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.7%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for broad money growth?
- Malaysia ranks 129th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 126th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.