Oman vs Trinidad and Tobago: Broad money growth (annual %)
Broad money growth (annual %) over time
- Oman
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Oman currently reports 4.2% against 3.7% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 23 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Oman ranks 136th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 139th of 167 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 29.8% | 27.0% | 2.9% | Oman |
| 1980s | 16.6% | 9.6% | 6.9% | Oman |
| 1990s | 8.0% | 9.1% | 1.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 13.8% | 13.8% | 0.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 9.4% | 4.6% | 4.8% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Oman or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Oman, at 4.2% against 3.7% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2017.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Oman and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.5%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2017.
- How do Oman and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for broad money growth?
- Oman ranks 136th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 139th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.