Rwanda vs United Arab Emirates: Broad money growth
Broad money growth over time
- Rwanda
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 19.0% against 18.8% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 23 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1974 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Rwanda ranks 29th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and United Arab Emirates in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 23.6% | 52.2% | 28.6% | United Arab Emirates |
| 1980s | 8.0% | 13.6% | 5.6% | United Arab Emirates |
| 1990s | 14.1% | 5.9% | 8.2% | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 17.0% | 21.1% | 4.1% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 7.0% | 8.9% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 21.2% | 10.5% | 10.7% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Rwanda or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 19.0% against 18.8% in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Rwanda and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.2%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United Arab Emirates?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and United Arab Emirates rank globally for broad money growth?
- Rwanda ranks 29th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.