Tanzania, United Republic of vs Yemen: Broad money growth
Broad money growth over time
- Tanzania, United Republic of
- Yemen
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 14.1% against 13.7% in Yemen, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 46th and Yemen ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania, United Republic of | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.4% | 21.3% | 4.2% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2000s | 22.0% | 17.9% | 4.1% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 16.5% | 12.0% | 4.6% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money growth, Tanzania, United Republic of or Yemen?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 14.1% against 13.7% in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in broad money growth between Tanzania, United Republic of and Yemen?
- 0.4%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Yemen?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2013.
- How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Yemen rank globally for broad money growth?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 46th and Yemen ranks 49th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.