Australia vs OECD members: Broad money
Broad money over time
- Australia
- OECD members
How they compare
Australia currently reports 133.1% against 113.1% in OECD members, a difference of 20.0%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times OECD members's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1960 it was OECD members ahead.
Australia ranks 14th and OECD members ranks 13th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and OECD members in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 46.5% | 58.3% | 11.7% | OECD members |
| 1970s | 43.6% | 70.8% | 27.2% | OECD members |
| 1980s | 42.3% | 87.6% | 45.2% | OECD members |
| 1990s | 60.0% | 97.9% | 37.8% | OECD members |
| 2000s | 80.2% | 103.0% | 22.8% | OECD members |
| 2010s | 109.6% | 113.7% | 4.1% | OECD members |
| 2020s | 133.1% | 124.0% | 9.1% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money, Australia or OECD members?
- Australia, at 133.1% against 113.1% in OECD members as of 2025.
- What is the difference in broad money between Australia and OECD members?
- 20.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and OECD members?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
- How do Australia and OECD members rank globally for broad money?
- Australia ranks 14th and OECD members ranks 13th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.