Cape Verde vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency)

Cape Verde
2.54 million units per square kilometre
in 2008
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.17 million units per square kilometre
in 2008
Cape Verde rank
52nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
54th

Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
01.0M2.0M3.0M197619922008

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 2.54 million units per square kilometre against 2.17 million units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 362,950 units per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 52nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 54th of 150 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 182,034 units per square kilometre 20,823 units per square kilometre 161,211 units per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 476,274 units per square kilometre 67,007 units per square kilometre 409,268 units per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 930,218 units per square kilometre 237,182 units per square kilometre 693,036 units per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 1.52 million units per square kilometre 1.04 million units per square kilometre 480,470 units per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), Cape Verde or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Cape Verde, at 2.54 million units per square kilometre against 2.17 million units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2008.
What is the difference in capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) between Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
362,950 units per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
30 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2008.
How do Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency)?
Cape Verde ranks 52nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 54th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/capital-accounts-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/capital-accounts-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Cape Verde vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 5,262 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.